LAE

Welcome to the LAE community!  Please feel free to start a discussion in the discussion tab or join in a conversation.

Discussions

Members

Resources

Events

 View Only
  • 1.  Some questions on 5.1 Server

    Employee
    Posted 12-02-2014 21:18

    Note: This was originally posted by an inactive account. Content was preserved by moving under an admin account.

    Originally posted by: xathras

    Hi,

    Some questions after we've recently installed 5.1 on a development box.

    1) for Active Directory is it possible to limit which groups can authenticate. Or is it anyone in that active directory?
    2) for property values. It is possible to have a common one which can be overridden. E.g. lets say To Email address may have a common email test@test.com but for individual graphs you may say go to test1@test.com instead?

    Wayne


  • 2.  RE: Some questions on 5.1 Server

    Employee
    Posted 12-02-2014 21:35

    Note: This was originally posted by an inactive account. Content was preserved by moving under an admin account.

    Originally posted by: stonysmith

    1) Are you asking about AD in general or, in conjunction with LAE?

    2) Two answers:
    a) if you are running graphs scripted, then you can set a unix environment variable say p_Recipient=test@test.com and then in the graph use {{*Recipient*}} to read that value from the unix environment. Individual graphs can obviously override this value.
    b) another option is to setup an email node with the default values you wish and then promote the node to a library (with a different name). Then when you use that node, it will have the default value unless you override it.


  • 3.  RE: Some questions on 5.1 Server

    Employee
    Posted 12-03-2014 06:51

    Note: This was originally posted by an inactive account. Content was preserved by moving under an admin account.

    Originally posted by: xathras

    Stony,

    1) Item 1 is AD in conjunction with LAE since its now supported
    2) Item 2 from a unix stand point I understand. As that's how we do today. I am thinking more along the terms of using the automation manager and the parameter sets.

    Wayne