During the month of November I undertook the #30DayMapChallenge where a different map was created every day following a specific theme, having been a MapInfo Pro user for more than 20 years I used MapInfo Pro for the majority of these maps. Following this @Peter Møller asked me to contribute to #MapInfoMonday using some of these maps as a basis for some articles. Today’s article focuses on thematic mapping and how the same data can be presented differently and how this may change how your map is interpreted. To see the original post on LinkedIn please take a look at #30DayMapChallenge
The data used for these maps came from the National Chargepoint Registry (NCR) which is a database of publicly available chargepoints for electric vehicles (EV) in the UK established in 2011. The data used in these maps can be found here.
The database provided the postcode of each publicly available EV chargepoint and was imported into MapInfo Pro, these were geocoded using Ordnance Survey CodePoint OpenData. Some postcodes had multiple chargepoints, therefore the data was grouped by postcode and the count of postcodes calculated and a thematic layer was added to the map.
What does this map tell us? It clearly shows that there are a higher number of Chargepoints in urban areas – which is pretty obvious – but it also shows that across England, Scotland and Wales there is a good distribution of Chargepoints even in more rural areas perhaps reducing the “range anxiety” that some motorists felt when first purchasing electric vehicles. However mapping the locations of individual charges doesn’t give a full picture.
The NCR data was grouped again into postcode districts to establish the distribution of EV chargepoints by region. The postcode district boundaries used in these maps was derived by creating Voronoi polygons of OS CodePoint OpenData. To learn more about creating Voronoi polygons please refer to this article - MapInfo Monday: Creating Voronoi Polygons from Points | MapInfo Pro.
In the map below the ranges used for the thematic map are the same as the map showing the individual locations above. The top range (i.e. the districts that have the most chargers) is 5+. Obviously there are a lot of postcode districts that have more than 5 Chargepoints within them and using 5+ as the top range is quite misleading as it suggests that the distribution of Chargepoints is fairly consistent across the South East. Clearly this map is not very useful and the ranges need to be changed to give the map more meaning.
------------------------------
Louise Kavanagh
Director
Apogee Data Consulting Ltd
Tenterden
------------------------------